Controversies about R&D
"Vampire Five is worse than 3rd edition. But all 5s are bad! D&D Five is also weaker than 3.5. The Blades in Darkness reissue ruined everything. But Cyberpunk RED is so much better than the 2020 shambles. How can you even play with such pathetic rules!?"
Sound familiar? Why does this happen? Why, when talking about games, do we constantly fall into talking about what's worse than what, and what works wrong with the games we don't play?
Don't judge me too harshly! This video is more about emotion and the mood and approach to the community that forms around our hobby than it is about specific practical things. But sometimes, even these things need to be discussed.
The channel has a Boost channel, and if you'd like, you can support it there and find a fairly large selection of additional materials:
https://boosty.to/zior
If you're interested in recordings of my games, you can find them here: / @requestforquestactualpla-yp2sm
0:00 Incredible, but!
2:48 Disputes and RPGs
8:25 Answer to a rhetorical question
14:22 Conclusion
On VK, I post homerules for the Old World of Darkness and other stuff: https://vk.com/public210959920
And here's a Telegram with roleplaying art from a neural network: https://t.me/NeuroDND
#TabletopRoleplayingGames #RPGs #DnD