Case Digest: Corpus vs. CA
Corpus v. CA 98 SCRA 424 (1980)
Doctrine: While there was no express contract between the parties for the payment of attorney’s fees, the fact remains that respondent David rendered legal services to petitioner Corpus and therefore as aforestated, is entitled to compensation under the innominate contract ot facio ut des. And such being the case, respondent David is entitled to a reasonable compensation.
View and/or download case digest here: https://www.scribd.com/document/58380...
#audio #casedigest #lawschool #lawstudy #lawstudent #studytool #studyhack #taxation