Reviewing MBTI Research: Is the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Scientific?
I explore MBTI research and challenge the idea that is an unscientific model.
Coaching and assessments: https://www.chrisgpsych.com
MBTI Zero to Proficient: https://www.chrisgpsych.com/courses
Studies
Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2002). Myers-briggs type indicator score reliability across: Studies a meta-analytic reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(4), 590-602.
Randall, K., Isaacson, M., & Ciro, C. (2017). Validity and reliability of the Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions Diversity, 10(1), 1-27.
Tzeng, O. C., Outcalt, D., Boyer, S. L., Ware, R., & Landis, D. (1984). Item validity of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 255-256.
Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1986). Second-order factor structure of the MBTI: A construct validity assessment. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 18(4), 148-153.
Thompson, B., & Borrello, G. M. (1986). Construct validity of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(3), 745-752.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr, P. T. (1989). Reinterpreting the Myers‐Briggs type indicator from the perspective of the five‐factor model of personality. Journal of personality, 57(1), 17-40.
The gear I use for recording (Affiliate Links)
Logitech Brio Webcam: https://amzn.to/3ubwcWW
Elgato Air Lights 2x: https://amzn.to/3raF2Cp
Blue Snowball Mic: https://amzn.to/3HaUmob