You're being lied to about the reasons for the SVO! N. Platoshkin explained how it really happene...
Support us by subscribing - https://boosty.to/outforjustice
Or by transferring to 5469380029089249, Sber, Roman D.
Subscribe to the Telegram channel - https://t.me/outforjustice_channel
A "sensational" theory is circulating online: supposedly Putin developed a cunning plan for a major war back in 2002 and spent 25 years preparing for it. A video featuring this theory has garnered millions of views. It sounds both mysterious and beautiful. The only problem is that if you look closely, this "concept" is completely razed to the ground. And Nikolai Platoshkin dissects it so thoroughly that you feel embarrassed for the author of this fairy tale. Are you ready to hear how plans actually work—real, documented ones, not made-up ones?
Let's start with a simple question that completely destroys the entire theory. If there was some kind of quarter-century-long plan, where are its results? Where is a single action that truly prepared the country for a major war? Platoshkin claims the opposite. In the 1990s and 2000s, Russia sold enriched uranium to the US—and that, mind you, is nuclear warheads decommissioned. Only five or six countries in the world can technologically produce such a thing; it's insanely expensive. And we simply gave it to the enemy. Up to half of American nuclear power plants run on our uranium—the same one our grandfathers made for Soviet missiles, undernourished and sleep-deprived. Is this preparation for war?
And it gets worse. They closed the bases in Cuba and Cam Ranh Bay. They bought up enormous sums of US debt—in other words, they simply gave America money. And what about Serdyukov's military reform? They closed dozens of military academies, liquidated divisions, disbanded military districts, and made a 300-man battalion the basic combat unit. Platoshkin also explains the story of the ABM Treaty—and this is perhaps the most interesting part. Why did the two superpowers agree in 1972 NOT to defend against a nuclear strike? The logic is brilliant: if you're intentionally open to attack and don't build a defense, then you're not going to attack. It was a guarantee of peace. But the Americans withdrew from the treaty in 2002 not because of Ukraine, but because the treaty had expired and the USSR no longer existed. The opportunity arose to create a missile defense system, to intercept a weakened Russian retaliatory strike—and then they could dictate anything to Russia. US strategy is transparent; they've never hidden it. And it has nothing to do with Donbas.
And now, about the real plans, which exist not in the fantasies of bloggers, but in declassified documents. Platoshkin explains what the CIA really was. This isn't intelligence in the traditional sense—the agency was created in 1947 as a tool for sabotage, subversion, coups, and even assassinations in "uncontrolled territories." With one condition: the US government could plausibly deny its involvement. Knock out the leader of the protests and blame the government. Shoot at a peaceful demonstration and blame the state security—like in Hungary in 1956.
The most telling example is Chile. When the socialist Allende was winning the elections, the CIA assassinated the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Schneider, a father of five, in order to blame the communists. They bribed a major newspaper, planted fakes in mailboxes about "sending children to Siberia," and intimidated women in churches with promises of sewing machines for voting "correctly." Kissinger put it bluntly: make the Chileans "scream in pain." Do you feel the difference with the mythical "Putin plan"?
And the final, most honest conclusion. The collapse of the USSR was a successfully implemented American plan, not a Russian one. Crimea and Donbas weren't part of a cunning 25-year scheme, but a reaction to the 2014 Maidan: if Yanukovych hadn't fled and Ukraine hadn't collapsed, everything would have remained as it was. Russia's main problem is that, unlike the US, it doesn't engage with the people of neighboring countries and doesn't offer an attractive idea. Two Ukrainian students, even before all the Maidan protests, simply told Platoshkin: "We're not against Russia, but we don't want to live like you." The USSR was a role model—there was no unemployment, free housing and education. But what can Russia offer the world today? We'll cover that in future episodes. For now, watch this analysis to the end; it turns the whole picture upside down.
⏱️ TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 — "A Cunning Plan Since 2002": Where Did This Million-Viewed Fairytale Come From?
02:44 — One Simple Question, After Which the Entire Theory Falls Apart
04:22 — Why Did They Close Bases and Sell Nuclear Warheads to the West?
07:33 — The Reform That "Hidden" the Army—or Did It Not?
11:06 — The ABM Treaty: Why Did Two Countries Voluntarily Open Themselves to an Attack?
18:33 — The US's Real Goal, Which They Never Hid
28:00 — What is the CIA Really, and What Does "Gentlemen Don't Read Other People's Emails" Have to ...