2-Year Rust Test: WD-40 vs Strike — Fertilizer Spreader Corrosion Experiment
This video shows a real 2-year corrosion comparison between two fertilizer spreaders exposed to nitrogen fertilizer — one treated with WD-40 and the other protected with Strike (StrikeHold).
The farmer explains how:
The WD-40–treated unit rusted quickly
Bolts, linkages, and moving parts corroded and failed
Even with washing and repeated WD-40 coatings, the machine deteriorated
In contrast, the Strike-protected spreader looks almost brand-new two years later
No bolt rust, no mechanism lock-ups, no structural corrosion
This real-world demonstration shows how corrosive nitrogen fertilizer can be — and how Strike’s protective coating outperforms WD-40 by bonding deeper, resisting wash-off, and preventing oxidation at the molecular level.
🔧 What This Video Demonstrates
Long-term rust resistance
Real farm equipment exposure
WD-40 vs Strike (StrikeHold) comparison
Why traditional oils fail against fertilizer corrosion
How Strike prevents oxidation before it begins
🧴 Want to Protect Your Own Equipment?
Learn more about StrikeHold at:
https://www.strikehold.com
📺 Subscribe for More Real-World Tests
We run ongoing corrosion challenges, side-by-side material tests, and live rust experiments in multiple liquids and environments.