A 4 MB Alpine image looks efficient — but it’s not the only option for container workloads.
In this video, we compare five lightweight Linux distributions commonly used as base images: Alpine, Alpaquita, Chiseled Ubuntu, RHEL UBI Micro, and Wolfi. There are no rankings or recommendations — just a structured look at how these distros differ so you can evaluate them in your own context.
We focus on the core aspects that actually matter in containers, including libc choices such as musl and glibc, image size and minimalism, release models like rolling and LTS, package ecosystems, and modern supply chain security features like SBOM and provenance.
This is a concise comparison designed to give you a clear picture of the trade-offs behind each option and help you make an informed decision for your stack.
Comparative Table: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-uk3...
00:00 — Why Base Image Choice Matters
00:12 — Alpine Linux
01:23 — Alpaquita Linux
02:45 — Chiseled Ubuntu
03:46 — RHEL UBI Micro
04:44 — Wolfi
05:59 — Conclusion