125 mm 3BM9 APFSDS Vs 120 mm M829 APFSDS
This video shows the 3BM9 APFSDS Vs M829 Tungsten Alloy and Depleted Uranium core penetration. It shows various APFSDS collision angles. It shows that 3VBM9 is completed vanished against the M829.
This Video presents 125 mm smooth bar 3VBM3/3BM9/10 APFSDS-T penetration with Leopard 2 tank. This video present the study on leopard front armor plate angle impact on APFSDS. This video highlights various angle of impact. It is observed that, the 3BM9 is failed to penetrate the leopard-2 tank due to its unique front armor plate angle. APFSDS instead of penetrating it slightly deviates upwards.
The Johnson + Cook material model is used for projectile. High velocity of 1800 m/s is applied to the projectile. The leopard tank 2 have composite armor but in present simulation we assumed rolled homogeneous armor as material.
Please subscribe to our channel: / @extremeengineeringsimulati5627
Music Credits: https://www.bensound.com/
Other Similar Videos:
1. 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration2
• 7.62 NATO x 51mm Bullet Penetration o...
2. 120 mm KE M829A2 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Armor Inclined Plate
• 120 mm KE M829 APFSDS Vs T44 Tank Arm...
3. Armor Piercing Bullet Penetration on Aluminum Plate # Finite Element Analysis , Failed Penetration
• Bullet Penetration Vs Aluminum Plate ...
4. 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Impact on 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
• 125mm BM15 APFSDS Projectile Vs 250 B...
5.Shot, A.P., 90mm, T33 Vs Pz Kpfw V (Panther) Tank # Armor Piercing simulation
• 90 mm t33 Vs German Pz Kpfw V (Panthe...
6. Low Quality Armor Vs Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars # Armor Piercing simulation
• Bomb (Kinetic Energy Penetrator) Vs R...
7.BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Piercing Simulation
• BM15 APFSDS Vs 250 BHN RHA #Armor Pie...