Not all discriminatory burdens of a protectionist kind (or with a protectionist effect) will breach section 92 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution. In this case, the High Court of Australia has demonstrated that proportionate discriminatory burdens with a protectionist effect may be justified and, as such, not infringe on the absolute freedom of trade and commerce.
0:00 - Section 92
1:09 - Facts
5:16 - Decision of the HCA
// This video does not provide legal counselling or opinion about cases. This channel was created for educational purposes only. //
SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/AussieLaw?s...
BECOME A MEMBER: / @aussielaw
*****
PLAYLISTS:
Australian Case Law - • Australian Case Law
Constitutional Law - • Australian Constitutional Law
Constitutional Interpretation - • Constitutional Interpretation
Constitutional Provisions Explained - • Constitutional Provisions Explained
*****
RELATED VIDEOS:
Express “Rights”: Free Trade, Commerce, and Intercourse between States (s 92) - • Express “Rights”: Free TRADE, COMMERCE and...
Cole v Whitfield: The Two Limbs of Section 92 and the Free Trade Theory - • COLE v WHITFIELD (1988): The Two Limbs of ...
What is a Discriminatory Burden of a Protectionist Kind? - • What is a Discriminatory Burden of a Prote...
Palmer v Western Australia (2021): Border Closures and the Freedom of Intercourse (s 92) - • PALMER v WESTERN AUSTRALIA (2021): Border ...
Australian Federalism, COVID, and Interstate Border Closures - • Australian FEDERALISM, COVID, and INTERSTA...
Express and Implied Rights in the Australian Constitution – • EXPRESS and IMPLIED RIGHTS in the Australi...
Characterisation and Proportionality: Tests to Balance the “means” and “ends” of Commonwealth Legislation – • Characterisation and PROPORTIONALITY: The ...
*****
RECOMMENDED READINGS:
Winterton's Australian Federal Constitutional Law (Gerangerlos, Aroney, Murray, Evans, Emerton, Stone)
*****
LINKS:
The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act : https://www.legislation.gov.au/Detail...
Castlemaine Tooheys v South Australia (1990) : https://jade.io/article/67548
*****
TWITTER: / renatosmcosta
ACADEMIC PROFILES:
https://law.uq.edu.au/profile/11028/r...
http://www.uq.academia.edu/RenatoSaeg...
#auslaw #australianconstitution #freetrade