Nearly all standard statistical models assume that the sample data are drawn from a homogeneous population, where one model structure and set of parameter values holds for everyone. However, sometimes, we sample data from known subpopulations (e.g., biological sex, nationality, race, or even assigned groups like treatment versus control) across which the values of the model parameters or potentially even the model structure might differ. In Episode 7 of Unscripted, Dan and Patrick discuss modeling approaches that allow for population heterogeneity as a function of observed subgroups (e.g., where subgroup membership is known), and how these approaches can be used to test different hypotheses about how the subgroups may differ from one another.
Please visit centerstat.org for additional freely-available instructional materials and other training opportunities. You can also sign up for notifications about future Unscripted episodes at centerstat.org/centerstat-unscripted/
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
Millsap, R. E. (2012). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.
Millsap, R. E. (1995). Measurement invariance, predictive invariance, and the duality paradox. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30(4), 577-605.
Millsap, R. E. (2007). Invariance in measurement and prediction revisited. Psychometrika, 72, 461-473.
Vandenberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational research methods, 5(2), 139-158.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational research methods, 3(1), 4-70.