Ad Hominem & Professor Dave (final part)
This is my final analisis regarding Dave's ad hominem, I feel it is imporant to understand logical fallacies and the nuanced nature that some of them can take on. I have nothing against Dave and fully support his channel and efforts, but when it comes to informal logic, he is just wrong about this one, and that is okay, we can't always be write about everything.
Ad Hominem:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/d...
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dicti...
https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary...
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/ad-...
Ad Hominem Arguments (Studies in Rhetoric and Communication)
https://www.amazon.com/Hominem-Argume...
I could be wrong:
https://digitalcommons.pittstate.edu/...
https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar... (not used in video)
Video I did on this topic where I was wrong:
• Dave Farina vs Dr. James Tour: Did Dave ad...
Video I did on this topic where I'm correct (technically):
• Dave Farina vs Dr. James Tour: Did Dave ad...
Moor video I did on Ad homiem:
• ad hominem: a common error we make.
• ad hominem: one more look.
I might indeed be a dickhead, but my arguments & analysis are might still be valid.
...
If you do not agree with this video, then you do not know what you are talking about
If you think that I'm wrong about this, you are bad thing!
(prove wrong)