Advocacy, Assessment, Accessibility: The Affective Work of Graduate Engaged Scholarship
IA member roundtables are member-organized spaces providing opportunities for IA network collaboration and to share and exchange publicly-engaged knowledge and practices that integrate the methodologies of arts, design, and the humanities.
This roundtable session, Advocacy, Assessment, Accessibility: The Affective Work of Graduate Engaged Scholarship, featured six UC Davis Mellon Public Scholars in dialogue about the emotional and social aspects of community-engaged graduate scholarship in the arts, humanities, and humanistic social sciences. From processing traumatic events, advocating for marginalized communities, to communicating the value of public work to academic audiences, engaged graduate scholars undertake a range of affective work that often goes unacknowledged. Stephanie Maroney (MPS Program Manager) and Lizbeth De La Cruz Santana (Spanish and Portuguese) center the keyword advocacy in their descriptions of engaged work with multiple audiences. Alana Hayes Stein (Sociology) and Chloe Brotherton (Linguistics) explore the limitations of assessment when evaluating and legitimizing graduate public scholarship. Brooke Kipling (Spanish and Portuguese) and Melinda Adams (Native American Studies) expand the idea of accessibility when working across communities and the university. This roundtable demonstrated how programs like MPS can create productive openings and transformative spaces for graduate students to pursue meaningful community engagement. Following presentations, all roundtable participants undertook a reflective exercise to deepen their understanding of how accessibility, assessment, and advocacy shape their own work.