AI vs. Humans: Who Is Better for the Job? - Logically Explained
Go to https://check.ground.news/logicamente... to stay fully informed and know where your news comes from. Subscribe through my link and get 40% off your Vantage subscription.
Since the arrival of ChatGPT, there has been this widespread idea that AI will replace all jobs and that everyone will end up as bums dependent on the government for a universal basic income. But this is far from the truth. Although AI is revolutionary, we have gone through several similar revolutions, such as in agriculture, electricity, technology, smartphones, the internet, and more. In fact, the majority of the workforce currently works in jobs that didn't even exist a generation ago. Therefore, it is absurd to think that future job prospects can be predicted based on how AI will affect current jobs. Furthermore, it often takes much longer than people think for machines to replace humans, as we saw with the push to automate factories. But even if all our current jobs were replaced, new ones would simply emerge to take their place. The only way this would be different would be for humans to become satisfied and stop seeking advancement, which is not in our nature. This video explains why the idea of AI replacing jobs is extremely overrated.
Chapters:
0:00 - AI TAKING OVER
2:22 - HUMAN RESILIENCE
5:45 - THIS TIME IS NO DIFFERENT
8:16 - THE AUTOMATION THAT NEVER HAPPENED
11:46 - JOB SHORTAGES DEBUNTED
Resources:
https://pastebin.com/jt73R3dG
If you enjoyed the content, remember to subscribe and like the video.
We are the official Spanish channel of Logically Answered. @LogicallyAnswered
We do the translations ourselves, we don't hire any companies, so you have direct contact with the team!