According to which ethics should one act as a politician? In his lecture "Politics as a Vocation," Max Weber introduces two fundamentally different orientations: the ethics of conviction and the ethics of responsibility. In this video, I explain the ethics of conviction and the ethics of responsibility using examples and illuminate the extent to which both orientations complement and/or exclude each other in politics.
▬▬👍 Channel Memberships ▬▬
🙌 Support my channel (become a channel member) ► https://bit.ly/3xQY8yn
🔴 Channel memberships can be canceled monthly and come with several benefits (see "Become a Member"). However, channel memberships are optional and in no way required. They are primarily a way to support me and my channel.
▬▬ 📖 Sources ▬▬
✅ Federal Agency for Civic Education (accessed on April 5, 2024): Ethics of Responsibility. Available online at: https://www.bpb.de/kurz-knapp/lexika/...
✅ Gebauer, Dietmar; Kres, Ludwig; Moisel, Joachim (2017): Philosophical Ethics. 2nd, revised and expanded edition. Freising: Stark (Abitur-Wissen Ethik).
✅ Weber, Max (2016): Politics as a Vocation. 4th, revised and expanded edition by Michael Holzinger. CreateSpace Independent.
▬▬ ⏱️ Contents ▬▬
00:00 | Introduction
00:27 | Weber's lecture: Politics as a Vocation
01:05 | Ethics of Conviction
02:35 | Ethics of Responsibility
04:10 | Weber: The Right Ethics?
07:23 | Max Weber: Power & Domination
▬▬ 🎓 My Background ▬▬
✅ I have a bachelor's degree in sociology and philosophy and a master's degree in sociology. I am currently writing my doctorate in sociology.
▬▬ 🔴 Note ▬▬
I make every effort to thoroughly research each video. However, I cannot accept liability for the accuracy and completeness of the content. Please check your documents for the ethics Abitur/other exams.