Christo Luciferianism Explained: Letter to a Friend
Thought this would help bring some light (lol) to this subject.
First of all, it is not necessary to invoke Freud in order to characterize the two basic polarities whose interplay forms existence, though to my sensibilities it is helpful. To each their own.
I prefer to call these qualities the psychological masculine and the psychological (Sacred) feminine. The first is associated with the element of fire, the light area of the Yin/Yang symbol, and the upward-pointing triangle in the Star of David. It is also associated with left brain concerns such as quantification, dissection, and linear perception.
The second, the psychological feminine, is associated with the element of water, the dark area of the Yin/Yang, and the downward-pointing triangle in the Star of David. It is also associated with right brain concerns such as imagination, intuition, and cyclical perception.
Simply put, the first is materialism and the second is spirituality.
Jesus, of course, opposes materialism (Mammon) in order to champion spirituality. Therefore, he rebels against the psychological masculine in order to exalt the psychological feminine. In essence, this is the Oedipal trend, which, to my way of thinking, is the Luciferian trend. This is why Luciferianism is associated with goddess worship, since the goddess is an anthropomorphic characterization of the psychological (Sacred) feminine. That is why Christ is associated with the Morning Star, Venus, whose pattern of movement in the heavens is that of a pentagram.
This is also the basic psychodynamic expressed in the old tales of a knight opposing a dragon to rescue a maiden, which is the gist of the movie Unforgiven. Surely there are countless other examples.
To better understand how Lucifer figures in with this mode of behavior it is helpful to examine the Sumerian stories from which the Abrahimic cosmology is drawn. In these stories there are two basic characters, Enki and Enlil, the feuding Anunnaki brothers.
Enki creates humankind by genetically (re)engineering existing bipeds, elightens humankind in the Garden, and saves humankind from the Deluge. Essentially, he represents EMPOWERMENT.
Enlil, on the other hand, is contemptuous of humankind, drives them from the Garden, and would have been happy to have seen them destroyed in the Deluge. He is the force of OPPRESSION.
Abram the Sumerian, whom we know as Abraham, synthesized these and other influences to form the composite, monotheistic character Yahweh. The cosmic neutrality incorporated into Abrahams retelling of the original stories figures strongly into the divine decision to grant his people stewardship of the neutral zone we call the holy lands, but that is a line of thought for another day. Whats important here is to note that the empowering force is the bringer of light in the Garden. The serpent, by the way, is another ancient symbol of the psychological feminine.
Therefore, the serpentine bringer of light, whom we can readily associate with our notions of Lucifer, is an agent of empowerment against oppression as is Christ. Enki, the creator of humankind, is as the true father god in the heavens invoked by Christ.
Ultimately, the light that is brought is unfettered right brain spirituality, the Sacred Feminine.
In the context of the Sumerian stories, Enki/Lucifer brought this enlightenment to his children to aid them against the oppressive manner of Enlils treatment. By that time Enlil had replaced Enki as ruler of the earth and viewed humankind as mere slaves.
This Enlilite domination of worldly existence, which exists to this day, explains why Enki/Lucifer has been so demonized (lol) in the propagandistic re-tellings of the Sumerian stories which precede and inform the major world religions. What is it they say about history being written by the victor?
For one, I am convinced that notions of a messianic second coming ultimately refer to the appointed cycle of Enkis reign which begins with the Age of Aquarius which is soon to be dawning.
In regards to nationalism, let me say that it is best understood as a path of self-chosen individuation, in regards to the state, and is commensurate with right brain concerns of de-standardized personal choice, as opposed to centralized and impersonalized dictates. The telling factor is that Jesus was a nationalist, who drove the money changers from the temple due to their collusion with internationalist Roman authority. A similar magnitude of nationalist dedication will be needed to build the Third Temple to accommodate the messianic second coming.
As Albert Pike well explains, Satan is not Lucifer. Satan is materialistic oppression in the tradition of Enlil. Enki is Lucifer. Enlil is Satan. Their composite character, which includes other personalities and forces, is Yahweh. Yahweh is both good and evil, which is well spoken to in Nietzsches The Antichrist.