To tell the truth I am confused about the 'guided installer' by Arch. Aren't there enough 'guided Arch Linux installers'? EZArcher, Calam, Zen, Archfi & plenty more.
I think that maybe with time the installer might improve but why? Why not offer Arch with two methods of installation? One being the standard CL install with only what I/others want while another offers what Arch wants for me/others. No sense. Is Arch joining the ranks of other countless 'spins' of Arch?
Give me a break. Keep Arch Arch & make your own spin & call it something else.
I can install Arch in about the same amount of time & have my XFCE desktop with all the software to boot. So, what is the point Arch Linux?
Let me know what you think.
Links used in the video.
https://archlinux.org/
other methods:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/...
Archinstall:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/...
Warning: archinstall is experimental software and offers different defaults
than the regular Installation process. When using a system installed with
archinstall, please mention so in support requests and provide
/var/log/archinstall.log.
to run arch install cmd: archinstall
Note: archinstall only supports UEFI systems.
python archinstall guided:
https://python-archinstall.readthedoc...
Thanks for watching & Arch On!