"But can it do computation?" Dam_n good question; workin on it :). No idea yet haha. Could look at it like a graph-based computation with Bayesian... nodes? Some sort of trust-region idea could work for each, "Number", and then combining those to do computation etc... exciting stuff methinks but tough to stay away from just being hyper speculative. (TRPO algorithm as a good reference perhaps.)
"Hey! This is just Bayes Theorem!" It definitely makes use of it and it's underlying assumptions; it is kinda just formulating the uncertainty into treating each minimum measurement instance, (For instance, Plank length), as an individual thing, (i.e. monad, number, "atom" etc.), rather than a latent variable. If you are uncomfortable giving it the metaphysical accolades and status of, "Number", tis fine to think of it as trying to get at the implications to NOT knowing. Which is why Bayes is so Bae.
What implications of NOT knowing are there I am overlooking? Lemme know :)
Also feel free to share why this is complete and utter dog sh!t; could be. Don't think so though.
Some snippets from uncle Freddy on Untruth: https://www.goodreads.com/work/quotes...
Doing a patronizing Patreon: / walkerstipe
Doing a PayPal: https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/walke...
Doing a Discord: / discord
Doing a GitHub: https://github.com/walkerstipe
F***ing socials…
Twitch: / walkerstipe
Twitter: / walkerstipe
Reddit: / walkerstipe
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/walkerstipe