Sanford Benardo, an attorney specializing in assisted reproduction law and President of the Northeast Assisted Fertility Group (NAFG), and Kathy Benardo, the egg donor coordinator at NAFG, discuss the implications for assisted reproduction technology, both actual and potential, of the Dobbs decision.
The Dobbs vs. Jackson ruling stated that the right to abortion is not guaranteed in the constitution. Although the ruling does not mention in vitro fertilization, it could open the door for restrictive laws in the future. This decision has caused worry and even panic among some IVF patients, as assisted reproduction technology is on the spectrum of reproductive rights.
In this part one, Sanford and Kathy focus on the abortion clause of the surrogacy contract: why this clause is included and why it has never been used, and if this will change which states where surrogacies can occur.
Link to the Dobbs v. Jackson here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions...
Link to the ASRM's statement on the Dobbs decision:https://www.asrm.org/news-and-publica...
Couples or singles interested in having a child through surrogacy and/or donor egg, or prospective carriers and donors, can contact us by phone at 1-800-710-1677, where you can speak to one of our staff directly, or by e-mail at [email protected].
https://www.assistedfertility.com/
https://www.takes3.com/
DISCLAIMER: NAFG is not a medical organization and does not provide medical advice. NAFG makes reasonable efforts to maintain the privacy of those who engage our services as intended parents, recipients, surrogates and egg donors. Please understand that NAFG does not control third-party Web sites or social media platforms. You assume the privacy and security risks inherent in your use of technology -- including that you may relinquish a certain degree of anonymity when you choose to participate in public Web forums or social media platforms.
#abortion #roevwade #northeastassistedfertilitygroup